The Following Post has been adapted, will be covered in upcoming sermon

What means this wild babel of tongues clamoring for subjects over which to exercise sway? What means this strange jargon, formed from an Old World monarchical vocabulary? Are men crazed with the madness sometimes begotten by victory at arms? Are men drunken with the lust of colonial empire? Are men raving in the delirium of that dread fever, earth-hunger, in which all the monarchies of the Old World are writhing? Think they in the hour of triumph over a foe, outclassed at every point, to build a tower of national greatness which will reach to the very heavens, and at the same time to lay its unrighteous foundations on the stricken forms of vassal peoples? The result will surely be as it was before in the case of the builders of Babel, there will be confusion of tongues, and the dissolution of the nation.

‘…The bad government kills out the good government as surely as slave labor destroys free labor, or as a debased currency drives out a sound currency.”

Economics Geopolitics & Societal Events Prophecy Russia-Ukraine Science & Technology

Are You Ready For A New World Order? The World Government Summit Is Asking

March 31, 2022

by Jacob M. Thompson

Add Comment

“And the question is, will that new system of digital money and digital accounting accommodate the competing needs of the citizens of all these locations, so that every human being has a chance to have a better life? Because that’s the only measure of whether a world order really serves.”

The World Government Summit for 2022 recently began in Dubai of the United Arab of Emirates, calling and asking for a new world order, and what steps will need to be taken to get the world there.

The World Government Summit, according to their official website, “is a global, neutral, non-profit organization dedicated to shaping the future of governments.”

‘The Summit, in its various activities, explores the agenda of the next generation of governments, focusing on harnessing innovation and technology to solve universal challenges facing humanity,’ they additional describe themselves.

They add, ‘Since its inception in 2013, the Summit has championed the mission of shaping future governments and creating a better future for humanity. The past 7 editions of the Summit have successfully established a new model to collaborate on an international playing field to inspire and enable the next generation of governments.’

‘The World Government Summit is a global knowledge exchange platform for governments that was established in 2013 under the dynamic leadership of His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE, Ruler of Dubai and is poised to scale newer heights of excellence and inclusivity.’

The organization is partnered with many of the more well-known international governmental and world affairs groups, along with media giants like CNN, CNBC, Bloomberg, Time, Sky News, EuroNews, and many other partners.

CNN’s Becky Anderson led the discussion on the 29th, kicking off the first official day of the summit, that was livestreamed to their official YouTube channel.

Anderson, just a few seconds in after stepping up to the podium asked, “Are we ready for a New World Order?,” noting that it is a “daunting subject” to discuss. She additionally stated similar sentiment that of President Joe Biden’s recent calls for a New World Order.

**Biden Explicitly Calls For A New World Order That ‘We’ve Gotta Lead It’ And ‘Unite The Rest Of The Free World’**

She stated:

I believe what is clear is that we have hit an inflection point. We are certainly living in a unique age of certainty and volatility in global affairs.
Whether you are from the global North, or the global South, we have all collectively lived through the twilight zone that was the pandemic, and the changes to our social, our digital, and our physical landscape that Covid-19 wrought.
And just as the world reemerges from the pandemic, we are faced with the Russian invasion of Ukraine which certainly feels like a transformative geopolitical moment.
Coming as that does against a backdrop of great power struggles, the emergence of middle powers of climate crisis and cyber security challenges, the trendline certainly seems to indicate a world headed in a disorderly direction.
Is the U.S.-led multilateral system created post-WWII to manage international relations so that the world would never see and experience the same chaos and disorder of a world war, is it anything like fit for purpose? And if not, what is the alternative? That is the purpose of this discussion today.

Prior to the year 1898 this USA government was a republic pure and simple. Its foundations were laid in principle, and not in power. It was not an empire in any sense of the word, for the foundations of an empire are laid in power, and not in principle. It was built upon that everlasting rock that right makes might. Against this the coming of floods and the blowing and beating of winds are alike powerless, for it standeth sure and falleth not forever. But empires, on the other hand, are built upon that sinking sand that might makes right. Against these the floods come, and the winds blow and beat, and they fall, and great is the fall thereof. PRUS 80.4

To-day this nation is in danger of abandoning the rock and settling upon the sand. The love of power, so prone to the human breast, is smothering priceless, eternal principle. From being a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, it is being rapidly transformed into a government of some of the people, by a few of the people, for all the people. This is imperialism as opposed to republicanism, and this is national apostasy. PRUS 81.1

Until the summer of 1898 the word “imperialism” was but little heard from the lips of Americans. Now the very atmosphere is fairly drenched with it. A perfect wave of imperialism has swept over the land, and the desire for an Imperial America, or an “Imperial Republic,” as it has been styled, sits supreme upon hundreds of scores of souls. But an imperial republic cannot exist. With equal sense and propriety one might talk about “good badness.” PRUS 81.2

Anderson then introduced the panel of different leaders and advisors for this discussion. Frist turning to His Excellency Dr. Anwar Mohammed Gargash, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Anderson, asked him, “Are you ready for a new world order?”

Though not answering with a yes or no, Gargash immediately pointed towards technological advancements here in the 21st century, that he compared to 26th century tech. But he said there is a problem:

But I think the frame of thinking is still 19th century. I think this is one of the problems that we have in the international system where if you look it’s still about nationalism, it’s still about state sovereignty, it’s still about use of force or non-use of source of force.
And I think this is one of the major major issues as we try to bridge really what is mentally you know governing international relations with the 19th century mode of thinking. But at the same time with technology fast fast ahead of us and the curve, I think we will be a major problem.

Once again the time has come when the Declaration of Independence is not held sacred by all, is not thought to include all. Once again, to make the bondage, not of the negro, but of the Filipino, universal and eternal, “it is assailed, and sneered at, and hawked at, and, torn, till, if its framers could rise from their graves, they could not at all recognize it.” PRUS 82.4

The forcible annexation of ……….. is now being attempted. The government of the United States is endeavoring to subject this people against their will. To enforce this idea is to enforce slavery; not in the extreme degree, to be sure, but in part and in principle nevertheless. On this point a United States senator has truly said:— PRUS 82.5

“Wherever a people are required to render an obedience which is involuntary, that requirement is an enslavement of that people. PRUS 82.6

“There are different degrees of enslavement. If we put our yoke upon a people, if we rule them arbitrarily, if we send them governors and judges, if we make laws for them without their participation, if we enforce obedience to such laws by our army, then it is an absolute enslavement. If, on the contrary, we allow them free institutions, but at the same time prescribe to them that they shall owe allegiance to a government against their will, it is none the less an enslavement, although less in degree.” https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/1619.410#467

Interestingly enough, The WinePress’ report, “Agenda 2030: You’ll Own Nothing And Be Happy,” cited a piece from the World Economic Forum and their visions for life in 2030, where the world is cultivated by autonomous smart cities. Near the end of their essay, they stated this:

My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages.
Once in awhile I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. No where I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me.

After that Fred Kempe – President and CEO of the think tank the Atlantic Council – spoke, and he, who said his former mentor was the infamous globalist Henry Kissinger, invoked a similar sentiment, that, “what do you mean new world order? We have not had a world order yet.” Rather, a Western order that was “imposed on the world.”

[This new order] can go two different directions with the war in Ukraine now being a decisive element. Either the jungle is back, as the historian Bob Kagan talks, and that we can go into a darker era.
Or we could go into an era because of the advances of science, advances of technology, there could be one of the most prosperous, promising, progressive, enlightened, moderate, modern eras that we’ve ever face[d].
I think we’re in a moment where that’s being decided, and I think the importance of the Ukraine issue is that’s a fulcrum for this, and how the world manages this and comes out of this, is going to have far-reaching consequences that go beyond Ukraine.

Later in the discussion, Pippa Malmgren – a former Special Assistant for President George W. Bush for the National Economic Council – explained how another major tenet for this new world order to work, the old monetary and currency systems must be abandoned; additionally noting how she felt that we are already in world war III that has extended beyond Ukraine.

“Nothing is more dangerous for a free people than the attempt to govern a dependent people despotically. The bad government kills out the good government as surely as slave labor destroys free labor, or as a debased currency drives out a sound currency.” 15 https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/1619.410#467

Surely this is plain enough from the author of the Declaration of Independence. Why, the very fundamental principle of the doctrine of a republic is diametrically opposed to the acquisition of territory by conquest. This truth is plainly set forth by John Fiske, the most philosophical of all the American historians. He divides nation-making into three classes, the third of which he styles the “English method.” This he defines as being the one which contains the “principle of representation.” Then he adds:— …..

“Our experience has now so far widened that we can see that despotism is not the strongest but well-nigh the weakest form of government; that centralized administrations, like that of the Roman empire, have fallen to pieces, not because of too much, but because of too little, freedom; and that the only perdurable government must be that which succeeds in achieving national unity on a grand scale, without weakening the sense of local and personal independence. For in the body politic this spirit of freedom is as the red corpuscles in the blood; it carries the life with it. It makes the difference between a society of self-respecting men and women and a society of puppets. Your nation may have art, poetry, and science, all the refinements of civilized life, all the comforts and safeguards that human ingenuity can devise, but if it lose this spirit of personal and local independence, it is doomed, and deserves its doom…. Of the two opposite perils which have perpetually threatened the welfare of political society,-anarchy on the one hand, loss of self-government on the other,-Jefferson was right in maintaining that the latter is really the more to be dreaded, because its beginnings are so terribly insidious.” 14 PRUS 87.1

“Nothing is more dangerous for a free people than the attempt to govern a dependent people despotically. The bad government kills out the good government as surely as slave labor destroys free labor, or as a debased currency drives out a sound currency.” 15

I see a future where we genuinely have ubiquity and not scarcity. I see a future where the internet is available for free for everyone in the most remote locations on the planet, for example.
And that means the location of power is going to shift. And I see … decentralization of power structures everywhere, in finance, in political power. In fact this conflict that we’re in right now may be the beginning of that shift.
What underpins a new world order is always the financial system. […] And what we are seeing the world today I think is we are on the brink dramatic change where we are about to, and I’ll say this boldly: we’re about to abandon the traditional system of money and accounting, and introduce a new one.
And the new one, the new accounting is what we call blockchain. It means digital. It means almost having a perfect record of every single transaction that happens in the economy, which will give us far greater clarity over what’s going on, and it also raises huge dangers in terms of the balance of power between states and citizens.
In my opinion we’re going to need a digital constitution of human rights if we’re going to have digital money. But also this new money will be sovereign in nature. Most people thing that digital money is crypto and private, but what I see are super powers introducing digital currency. The Chinese were the first, the U.S. is on the brink I think of moving the same direction, [and] the Europeans have committed to that as well.
And the question is, will that new system of digital money and digital accounting accommodate the competing needs of the citizens of all these locations, so that every human being has a chance to have a better life, because that’s the only measure of whether a world order really serves.

**Biden Signs Executive Order To Usher In ‘The Future Of Money,’ Bringing In Regulated Currency**

Also at this summit, founder of the World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab made an appearance, weighing in and giving his two cents; who, again, reemphasized that we are in the midst of what he calls the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

History is truly at a turning point.
We do not yet know the full extent and the systemic and structural changes which will happen. However, we do know the global energy systems, food systems, and supply chains will be deeply effected. In times of crisis, the role of governments is more important and more relevant than ever.
What is also needed is a summit like this one [..], and to look into constructive ways we can build our common future.
Our futures are intrinsically connected to one another as profound challenges to mankind such as climate change are globally interconnected, and require collaborative responses.
In conclusion, and despite all the challenges, we have to uphold our responsibility which we have towards the next generation, at which we can only fulfill through collaboration on a national and on a global level.

‘The laws, however, which must effect this must flow from their own habits, their own feelings, and the resources of their own minds. No stranger to these could possibly propose regulations adapted to them. Every people have their own particular habits, ways of thinking, manners, etc., which have grown up with them from their infancy, are become a part of their nature, and to which the regulations which are to make them happy must be accommodated. No member of a foreign country can have a sufficient sympathy with these. The institutions of Lycurgus, for example, would not have suited Athens, nor those of Solon, Lacedaemon. The organizations of Locke were impracticable for Carolina, and those of Rosseau for Poland. Turning inwardly on myself from these eminent illustrations of the truth of my observation, I feel all the presumption it would manifest should I undertake to do what this respectable society is alone qualified to do suitably for itself.” 19 PRUS 89.2

This is all admirable truth. No self-respecting community will cheerfully obey any other than self-imposed laws. They may obey through fear, or on account of the presence of armed force, but there will always be danger of riots caused by discontent, or of insurrection in the hope of freedom. Liberty is an inalienable right. Nature has planted it in the human breast, and just as long as it exists there, many and grievous will be the troubles of colonial empires. The cases of Ireland and India under British rule are cases in point. PRUS 89.3

Colonial empires are wrong in principle. The conception of the thing itself is wrong. Colonial empires are built upon arbitrary theories and force, instead of on natural law. The splendid colonial system of England is held up as an example of this type of government; but Goldsmith called upon legislators— PRUS 90.1

” … to judge how wide the limits stand Betwixt a splendid and a happy land.” PRUS 90.2

Lord Macaulay himself denied the value of colonies, even to European nations:— PRUS 90.3

**The Great Reset Versus The Great Awakening: Fighting For The Same Team**

To see more of the discussion, and so much more, see their YouTube channel for more information.

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

What once used to be called “conspiracy theory” could not be any more truthful and factual, as these elites are just flying it in everyone’s face: and yet the fickle masses are more interested in an actor pretending to slap another actor.

Therefore wait ye upon me, saith the LORD, until the day that I rise up to the prey: for my determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy.
Zephaniah 3:8

This new world order is being wrought because it is THE LORD who is the one causing it, because of the nation’s iniquities and who despise his word. And so this new world order is being constructed together because the Lord is going to soon destroy them all. Do not lost sight of that.

Moreover, this push for this new digital currency that The WinePress has been warning about for some time, is now right around the bend. And, you read that demented lady’s description of how they are going to do it. But to summarize, she is talking social credit scores. Ultimately, this is another critical step closer towards the mark of the beast.

[16] And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: [17] And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. [18] Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
Revelation 13:16-18

In the not too distant future, the West (and some parts of the East) will utterly collapse, and people will be begging for this Great Reset, and to be plugged into the smart cities. But there will be many who will live in those “19th century homes” that are just so ‘evil.’ Or, as the Bible calls it, a return to some of the “old paths” (Jeremiah 6:16).

Therefore, as things continue to look bleak, trust the Lord, and be patient: opportunity will arise and present itself.

[1] A Psalm of David. Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity. [2] For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb. [3] Trust in the LORD, and do good; so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed. [4] Delight thyself also in the LORD; and he shall give thee the desires of thine heart. [5] Commit thy way unto the LORD; trust also in him; and he shall bring it to pass. [6] And he shall bring forth thy righteousness as the light, and thy judgment as the noonday. [7] Rest in the LORD, and wait patiently for him: fret not thyself because of him who prospereth in his way, because of the man who bringeth wicked devices to pass. [8] Cease from anger, and forsake wrath: fret not thyself in any wise to do evil. [9] For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth. [10] For yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yea, thou shalt diligently consider his place, and it shall not be. [11] But the meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace. [12] The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. [13] The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming. [34] Wait on the LORD, and keep his way, and he shall exalt thee to inherit the land: when the wicked are cut off, thou shalt see it.
Psalms 37:1-13, 34

[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).

The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.

CLICK HERE TO DONATE

WHO Calls For More Surveillance To End Covid Spread This Year

New York City Is Now Paying Residents To Snitch And Report On Idling Trucks For Profit

CDC Is Now Warning Children Are Developing Hepatitis Due To ‘Common Virus’

Chipotle Releases New RFID Packaging For Improved Traceability

Teenage Girls Are Developing Tics And Doctors Are Finding TikTok Is The Cause

Scientists Develop A Moving Shape-Shifting Magnetic Slime Robot For Surgeries

Street Preacher Arrested Outside Tennessee Church Is Now Suing The State

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Featured Posts

15 Most Viewed Posts

The Forgotten Verses Of Salvation

Author: Adventist Angels Watchman Radio

Welcome to Adventist Angels Watchman Radio now Live International official Page preparing the People of the world For Jesus Christ second coming. find us on Facebook YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Palcity and Gettr View all posts by Adventist Angels Watchman Radio

Are You Ready For A New World Order? The World Government Summit Is Asking